Comments on: Oxygen 101

By: Stephen Niedzielski

Stephen Niedzielski — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:51:44 +0000

i enjoy the title of the album, btw. makes me think of youth.

By: Sean

Sean — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:12:15 +0000

I am really confused Stephen.

By: Robin Sulkosky

Robin Sulkosky — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:31:03 +0000

THE DICK, THE DICK

By: Stephen Niedzielski

Stephen Niedzielski — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:29:28 +0000

000002AE 0000029C 000034E0 00002840 0002F46D 00020129 00007761 00007F0F 00020ADB 00023258; 00000000 00000210 00000783 0000000000C2BEED 00000000 005845F5 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000

By: Stephen Niedzielski

Stephen Niedzielski — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:29:22 +0000

oh robin, if only we too could be so absolved of your frequent and overly-harsh criticisms. i kid.

my favorite part of the revised A Good Year? the tags. this is a good comment:

Awesome, concise. Real Logic Pro 8.0.0, as we say. It’s so good I may just comment with that some time. tt.

Anyway, I like this version slightly more.

By: Cody

Cody — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:37:44 +0000

I am refering to your singing style.

By: Robin Sulkosky

Robin Sulkosky — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:58:22 +0000

In my defense, it’s hard to escape scrutiny, as I’m always talking or writing in English. I’m jerst trying to, er, obviate any asinine corrections that may be coming my way. It’s definitely paranoia.

By: xacksymnz

xacksymnz — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:46:12 +0000

Almost as surely as robin will continue digging his own english major grave with constant self-referencing, It will take quite some time before I am able to digest this entry fully, much to my dismay. I am also dismayed to find a sentence in your comments even longer than the previous by me.

By: Robin Sulkosky

Robin Sulkosky — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:00:15 +0000

Nor properly used negatives! To bed with the whole grammar business.

By: Robin Sulkosky

Robin Sulkosky — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:58:54 +0000

We don’t need not stinkin’ articles.