Things are as you see them I am beginning to notice. That was a glorious light bulb that flicked on in my head the other day. There are so many people that have problems in the world, and why? So many people that complain and gripe about every little thing that happens to them. I would just like to say, that you are given a choice when something bad happens to you. You can either make the day brighter or you can wallow in misery all day. One of the choices actually helps out. One of them is hard to do. One of the choices is just an easy fix for the situation. I think that we are just lazy as people. Too lazy to actually force ourselves to do anything. Too lazy to actually try and make things better. It takes years and years to paint a master piece. It takes the most skilled and trained of artists to do so, and yet all it takes to destroy it is a 2 year old child with crayons. I think that you can get my point. Sometimes the only thing that we can see in anything is the negative aspect. The reason being is that it is a lot harder to focus on the positive. I think that we need to stop being babies and learn how to brighten our lives.
  |
|
|
Good DayTuesday, June 26th, 2007, 9:01 PM CentralSarah Ann Pool |
June 27th, 2007 at 6:29 AM
Vat zi hell?
June 27th, 2007 at 6:34 AM
^That was more in response to a random return rather than the post itself.
To the post itself I say: There is no positive or negative, me are all just objects in space waiting to decay.
I’d also like to be the first to say, I think S.A.P. is Stephen’s female alter-ego.
You heard it here first. Back to you Dan.
June 27th, 2007 at 8:17 AM
An interesting, shocking, and unexpected turn of events. Hello. ..”sarah.”
June 27th, 2007 at 4:06 PM
Thanks, Bill. Well, just from taking a look at the radar i’d say rain is pretty hit or miss today–It’s either gunna’ happen or it’s not. But thanks to a new outlook on life, I’m looking through all those nasty clouds hoping for a peek at a little sunshine, and I’m sure we could could all benefit from a little sunshine *chuckle. Alright, Sarah.
(xack) - but seriously…I agree (and maybe also about this ’sarah’ being stephen…i pondered on it previously).
June 27th, 2007 at 9:10 PM
I’m certain that sarah is most definitely not stephen. Nor is she Stephen. Sarah’s got you all fooled!
June 28th, 2007 at 6:53 AM
Good point Gregor Swenz, I wait no, he’s a real person….right?
Your right, Stephen could not possibly be S.A.P.
Tell me, why did you put her name in quotations?
June 28th, 2007 at 3:43 PM
She’s a fiction. It’s like bunny ears. In print.